AI vs CLM: Are Legal Teams Abandoning Traditional Contract Systems for AI?
AI is delivering on promises CLMs couldn't keep. In this post, we explore why modular AI tools are quietly replacing contract lifecycle management systems—and what it means for your legal stack.
AI vs CLM: Are Legal Teams Abandoning Traditional Contract Systems for AI?
For the past decade, Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) platforms promised to revolutionize the way legal teams manage agreements. But ask most in-house counsel, and you’ll hear a different story: bloated rollouts, complex integrations, and tools that fall short of expectations.
Now, a quiet revolution is taking place.
Legal teams are starting to bypass CLMs entirely—turning instead to modular AI tools that are faster, smarter, and easier to deploy. These AI tools aren't just promising transformation. They're delivering it.
Why Modular AI Is Winning
CLMs often require months of implementation, configuration, and training. Modular AI tools—on the other hand—are plug-and-play. They slot neatly into your inbox, document hub, or review flow, handling tasks like:
- 🔍 Contract summarization
- ✍️ Drafting new clauses
- 🚩 Redlining and risk detection
- 📊 Insights and clause analysis
This means legal teams get immediate value—without needing to overhaul their stack or endure another 9-month “digital transformation” project.
Where AI Outperforms Legacy CLM Systems
Let’s break down where modular AI tools are already surpassing traditional CLMs:
1. Redlining
- CLMs: Rely on static templates and pre-programmed rules that often lack flexibility or context.
- AI Tools: Understand the clause in context, spot deviations from preferred language, and suggest edits dynamically.
2. Drafting
- CLMs: Require rigid template libraries and extensive setup to generate agreements.
- AI Tools: Instantly generate customized clauses or entire documents based on simple prompts or historical contract data.
3. Summarization
- CLMs: Rarely offer this functionality, or it’s hidden in premium tiers.
- AI Tools: Provide out-of-the-box summarization tailored for legal and business stakeholders alike.
4. Risk Analysis
- CLMs: Use rule-based checklists, often maintained manually.
- AI Tools: Automatically flag risky or non-standard terms in real time, adapting to company-specific playbooks.
5. Integration & Rollout
- CLMs: Require extensive IT support, long onboarding, and change management.
- AI Tools: Deploy in minutes, integrate with your existing tools (email, Drive, etc.), and don’t need technical staff to manage.
What This Means for Your Contract Stack
This shift isn’t about replacing CLMs overnight—but it is a sign to rethink your contract strategy.
If your CLM feels like a graveyard of unused features, consider a layered approach:
- Keep your existing system for storage and audit trail.
- Use AI layers on top for negotiation, intake, and drafting.
- Empower legal and business users with interfaces they’ll actually use.
The rise of AI-native tools represents a second wave of contract tech—less about lifecycle control, more about enabling fast, intelligent action.
TL;DR?
CLMs promised transformation. AI is delivering it. The legal teams of tomorrow won’t just manage contracts—they’ll collaborate with AI to move faster, reduce risk, and actually get things done.
Tags
About Jarryd Strydom
Ex-McKinsey consultant & lawyer (law firm and in-house) with deep legal workflow expertise, built legaltech for Fortune 500s.