Sandstone Logo

Why Legal Teams Are Choosing AI Intake Over Shared Inboxes

Shared inboxes bury context and slow decisions. This post shows how AI intake and triage agents turn messy requests into structured workflows, cut cycle time, and give legal ops auditability—without…

Jarryd Strydom

August 27, 2025
In many in‑house teams, 35–50% of contracting cycle time disappears before a lawyer opens a draft: intake, triage, context gathering, and back‑and‑forth across email and Slack. Shared inboxes and web forms feel simple, but they hide work, multiply follow‑ups, and make it hard to prove impact. AI intake changes that by turning every request into structured data, applying your playbook instantly, and routing work with the right context—so legal moves faster and the business stays aligned.

The Hidden Tax of Shared Inboxes

Shared inboxes were designed for volume, not nuance. They flatten signal (Who is the counterparty? What data is missing? Which policy applies?) into unstructured threads. The result is avoidable friction:
  • Repeated follow‑ups to collect basics like entity, term, and data sharing.
  • Manual routing and context hand‑offs that break SLAs.
  • No reliable audit trail of decisions or playbook rationale.
For legal ops, the downstream impact is real: longer time‑to‑first‑touch, unclear ownership, and limited visibility into where work stalls. When procurement, sales, and security run on systems with IDs and metadata, legal’s unstructured intake becomes the bottleneck—even when the team is doing heroic work. The fix isn’t “more forms.” It’s smarter intake that meets requesters where they already work and structures the request on the fly.

What an AI Intake Agent Actually Does

An AI intake and triage agent—like the agents on Sandstone—sits across the channels your business uses (email, Slack, Microsoft Teams, procurement portals) and turns a vague ask into a fully formed, policy‑aware ticket. Concretely, it can:
  • Ask dynamic follow‑ups to collect missing data (e.g., data categories, revenue tier, governing law) based on your playbook.
  • Classify request type (NDA, MSA, order form, DPA, SOW) and risk tier using rules plus model signals.
  • Apply positions from your clause and fallback library, generating a first‑pass NDA or redlines for low‑risk terms.
  • Route to the right owner and queue with SLA, priority, and context attached.
  • Sync metadata and files to CLM (contract lifecycle management), CRM, ticketing, and data rooms for a single source of truth.
Because the agent captures every question, answer, and decision, you get an auditable trail and structured data from day one—no new forms, no retraining the business.

Guardrails Legal Needs: Accuracy, Auditability, Control

Speed is irrelevant without controls. Modern agents succeed when they respect legal’s guardrails:
  • Policy‑bound reasoning: The agent reasons with your approved positions, not the open internet.
  • Deterministic routing: Clear rules for who sees what, when, and how approvals escalate.
  • Human‑in‑the‑loop: Automatic handling for low‑risk matters; seamless handoff for nuance or escalation.
  • Full audit trail: Every prompt, answer, document version, and decision is logged.
  • Data residency and privacy: Configurable redaction, retention, and region controls.
On Sandstone, your layered knowledge—playbooks, clause preferences, negotiation notes—becomes the model’s operating context. Each intake makes the system smarter, so the next request is faster and more precise. Strength through layers, in practice.

Start Small: Two High‑ROI Use Cases

You don’t need a big‑bang rollout to see impact. Pilot in one or two flows where volume is high and risk is bounded:
  • NDAs and low‑risk DPAs: The agent collects counterparties, purpose, data types, and term, then issues the right template or marks safe‑to‑sign. Expect material gains in time‑to‑signature and fewer touches.
  • Vendor intake via procurement: When a team adds a tool, the agent asks the right privacy, security, and commercial questions once, maps them to policy, and routes to legal, security, and finance in parallel.
Both cases demonstrate faster cycle times, cleaner data, and better requester experience without changing how teams submit requests.

Prove It With Metrics That Matter

Before you pilot, baseline a few KPIs—then measure again after two weeks:
  • Time to first response (TTR) and time to routing.
  • Cycle time by request type and risk tier.
  • Auto‑approval/auto‑draft rate for low‑risk matters.
  • Reopen rate and reasons (missing data, wrong routing, unclear scope).
  • Requester satisfaction (a simple post‑close CSAT or emoji scale works).
When intake is structured by design, these numbers move quickly—and they stay defensible with a clean audit trail.

A Practical Next Step

Run a 10‑day intake experiment:
  1. Choose one flow (NDAs or vendor intake) and write the must‑ask questions and routing rules.
  2. Load your positions and templates into a controlled sandbox (e.g., Sandstone’s knowledge layer).
  3. Turn on the AI agent in one channel (Slack or email), keep humans in the loop, and track the five KPIs above.
If cycle time drops and quality holds, expand to an adjacent flow and add auto‑drafting where risk is truly low.

The Bigger Payoff: Legal as a Compounding System

When every request becomes structured data, legal stops losing knowledge to inboxes. Your playbooks get sharper, routing gets cleaner, and decisions compound. That’s the promise of a modern legal ops platform like Sandstone: a living operating system where intake, triage, and negotiation work in harmony with the business. The outcome isn’t just speed—it’s trust. And trust is the bedrock of growth.

About Jarryd Strydom

Jarryd Strydom is a contributor to the Sandstone blog.